101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Beyond notice-report: Having fun with latency to respond to model the question reacting process on the web-based public-opinion surveys,” from the Sourcebook to own Political Communication Search , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you will Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Bing Beginner

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you may Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political attitudes vary with physiological faculties,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is feminine more likely to choose to have ladies circumstances expense than simply their men acquaintances?” Legislative Degree Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Feminine Create: The policy Perception of women inside the Congress ( Chi town : University away from Chicago Press , 2002 ).Bing Pupil

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you will Hurley , Patricia Good. , “Symbolic speeches throughout the You.S. Senate in addition to their representational ramifications,” Diary from Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Will be blacks represent blacks and you may feminine show women? An excellent contingent ‘yes’,” Record out-of Politics 1999 , 61 ( step three ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle College student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political studies and detailed symbolization of women,” Governmental Choices 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Student

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Can there be a great ‘gender affinity effect’ from inside the American government? S. Family elections,” Political Browse Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This informative article has been cited because of the following courses. It checklist is made considering studies provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A good. and you will Crave, Ellen 2015. Is it Gender, Religiosity otherwise Each other? A task Congruity Theory from Candidate Electability inside Transitional Tunisia. Viewpoints toward Politics, Vol. thirteen, Matter. step one, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Which stereotypes women applicants? Identifying private variations in feminine label reliance. Government, Teams, and you will Identities, Vol. step three, Situation. step one, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The character regarding gender in detailed representation,” Political Research Every quarter 1995 , forty-eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and you will McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever women attack. Politics therefore the Lifestyle Sciences, Vol. 34, Material. step 1, p. forty two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering combined signals: the newest character out-of gender and you may partisanship during the evaluations out-of political figures. Record out-of Elections, Public-opinion and you can People, Vol. twenty-six, Procedure. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you can Obermaier Islandski katalog mladenki, Magdalena 2016. Having Cardiovascular system and you will (No) Notice? Just how Users Negatively Infer Lost Details about Political figures and exactly how So it Impacts brand new Research of Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Thing. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Thinking out-of Feminine Political figures: Happening out-of Poland. Government inside Central European countries, Vol. fourteen, Question. step 3, p. seven.

Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. The application of Personal Character Idea into Examination of Gender during the Government. Political Psychology, Vol. forty, Procedure. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sun More youthful and you may Baek, Young Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence towards the Female Political figures: As to the reasons Ambivalence Things to own Gender Equivalence inside an effective Democracy. Log of females, Politics & Rules, Vol. 40, Point. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Murder and you may Ladies in Politics. Corvinus Log away from Around the globe Facts, Vol. 4, Thing. 1, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you will Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leaders on the Media: Gender Bias inside the Chief Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times. British Diary out of Political Technology, Vol. fifty, Matter. step three, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do Customers Assess Roadway?Height Bureaucrats’ Warmth and you may Competence? A great Typology and you will Take to. Personal Management Remark, Vol. 80, Question. 4, p. 532.